Skip to main content

Ohio health insurers by reported claim denial rate

11 marketplace issuers in Ohio reported 2,422,669 denials on 12,569,921 in-network claims from 2023 (pooled rate 19.3%). The median rate among the 11 ranked issuers is 19.6%, against a national median of 18.3% across 32 HealthCare.gov states. Of 7,379 internal appeals filed, 46.1% were overturned.

All issuers reporting in Ohio, plan year 2025 file

#IssuerClaims receivedDeniedDenial rateAppeals filedOverturned
1UnitedHealthcare of Ohio, Inc.345,239125,77636.4%34247.1%
2Summa Insurance Company, Inc.231,93657,44124.8%24468.8%
3Molina Healthcare of Ohio, Inc.1,220,402294,19824.1%51629.6%
4Community Insurance Company(Anthem BCBS)3,309,316731,78922.1%79332.7%
5CareSource Ohio, Inc.2,082,858445,24321.4%25743.2%
6AultCare Insurance Company263,96251,84919.6%7443.2%
7Oscar Buckeye State Insurance Corp.130,35324,64318.9%1,74544.5%
8Paramount Insurance Company143,42822,06215.4%2972.4%
9Buckeye Community Health Plan2,964,447427,74614.4%60464.7%
10Medical Health Insuring Corp. of Ohio1,725,912227,43113.2%1,01753.2%
11Oscar Insurance Corporation of Ohio152,06814,4919.5%1,75844.8%

Sorted by reported in-network denial rate. Rank is shown only for issuers with at least 1,000 in-network claims received; smaller issuers are listed without a rank. Source: CMS Transparency in Coverage PUF.

Read these numbers carefully
  • Reporting lag: the CMS public-use file for a plan year reports claims from two plan years earlier (the PY2025 file carries 2023 claims). These are not this year's figures.
  • In-network only: the denial rate is in-network claims denied divided by in-network claims received. Out-of-network claims are shown separately where the issuer reported them.
  • "Denied" is broad: CMS counts every denial, including administrative denials, duplicate submissions, ineligibility, incorrect billing and partial denials, not only medical-necessity decisions.
  • Issuer level: CMS reports the counts once per issuer per state and repeats them on every plan row; plan-level counts, where present, list denials only, so no per-plan rate is computed.
  • Coverage: only issuers on the federally facilitated marketplace (HealthCare.gov states) report to this file. Employer plans, Medicare and Medicaid are not included.
  • No inference of intent: a higher rate can reflect the issuer's mix of claims, its billing rules or its membership as much as its coverage decisions. Compare with the state median and read the N.

Source: CMS Transparency in Coverage Public Use File (Health Insurance Exchange PUFs) · data dictionary.

Denied in Ohio? What to do

Questions

Which Ohio marketplace insurer reported the highest claim denial rate?

Among issuers with at least 1,000 in-network claims, UnitedHealthcare of Ohio, Inc. reported the highest rate in the plan year 2025 file: 36.4% (125,776 of 345,239 claims from 2023). The Ohio median is 19.6%. A high rate can reflect claim mix and billing rules as much as coverage decisions.

Does a lower denial rate mean a better plan?

Not by itself. Rates include administrative denials and depend on the issuer's membership and claim mix. Use the rate alongside network, premium, formulary and the appeal overturn rate, and read the caveats.

Where does this data come from?

The CMS Transparency in Coverage public use file for plan year 2025, which reports each issuer's 2023 in-network claims received and denied, internal appeals and external reviews for plans sold on HealthCare.gov. Apellica removed stand-alone dental issuers and computed nothing beyond the reported counts.

How do I appeal a denial in Ohio?

File an internal appeal within the deadline on your letter (at least 180 days on marketplace plans), request the plan's criteria and claim file in writing, then use Ohio's external review if the plan upholds the denial. The regulator is Ohio Department of Insurance.

Ask an AI assistant about this page:ChatGPTPerplexityGoogle AIClaudeOpens in a new tab with a question about this page. Nothing about you is sent.

Download the full table as CSV · methodology · CC BY 4.0.