Liposuction for Morbid Obesity: 14.3% of denials overturned
In 7 California IMR decisions from 2007 to 2018, reviewers overturned 1 (14.3%). 7 were medical-necessity disputes.
What the findings mention
| What the findings mention | Decisions | Overturned | All decisions here |
|---|---|---|---|
| Records did not supportThe findings say the documentation did not show what was needed (usually an upheld denial). | 4 | 0.0% | 14.3% |
Keyword matches on the reviewer’s findings, not causes. A tag that appears mostly in overturned decisions is worth documenting in an appeal; it is not a guarantee.
From recent overturned decisions
“Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested suction lipectomy for treatment of the enrollee’s medical condition. Findings: The physician reviewer found that in this patient’s case, there is well-documented evidence of lipedema of the lower extremities. This has affected her function with chronic pain and difficulty with ambulation. Conservative management has included attempted weight loss, exercise, compression stockings, …”
And one the reviewer upheld
“Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for vaser water assisted liposuction and tumescent liposuction. The submitted documentation fails to demonstrate the medical necessity of the requested services. This patient underwent bilateral lower and upper extremity liposuction in 2015. It is unclear to what degree the patient had benefited from this surgery. Liposuction is a …”
- California only: these are decisions by independent reviewers under California's IMR program (plans regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care). Other states and self-funded employer plans use different reviewers and rules.
- Selection: only denials that a member took all the way to IMR appear. Most denials are never appealed, and the ones that reach an external reviewer are not a random sample.
- Overturned means the reviewer disagreed with the plan; it does not mean the treatment worked or that a similar request will be approved.
- Argument tags are keyword matches on the reviewer's findings. They describe what the findings mention, not why the case was decided.
- Categories are DMHC's own labels (treatment sub-category and diagnosis category); 'Other' is a catch-all and is excluded from rankings.
Source: California Department of Managed Health Care, Independent Medical Review (IMR) Determinations, Trend (CHHS Open Data). Public California government data; Apellica's aggregates and tags are CC BY 4.0.
Questions
How often were Liposuction denials for Morbid Obesity overturned?
In 7 California IMR decisions from 2007 to 2018, reviewers overturned 1 (14.3%). 7 were medical-necessity disputes.
What should an appeal document, based on these findings?
Whatever the plan's criteria ask for, shown in the record: the treatments already tried and their results, contraindications to the plan's preferred option, the guideline or evidence that supports the request, and the treating clinician's reasoning written to the criteria. The tag table shows which of these the reviewers mentioned most in overturned cases.
Does a California IMR result apply to my plan?
Only California plans regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care go to IMR. Other states and self-funded employer plans use different reviewers, but they weigh the same things.
Independent reviewers reverse plans when the record answers the criteria. Upload the denial letter; a senior reviewer reads it within 24 hours and tells you in writing whether it can be appealed and how. $0 upfront, 10% of what is recovered, nothing if we do not recover. Not a law firm.