Skip to main content
A rule that decides appeals

No Surprises Act: out-of-network bills you cannot be charged

For emergency care, and for out-of-network clinicians at an in-network facility, the plan must pay at in-network cost-sharing and the provider cannot balance-bill you, with narrow notice-and-consent exceptions. If the bill or the denial comes from one of those situations, the argument is statutory, not clinical.

Last reviewed Sep 11, 2026 · General information, not legal advice · Apellica is not a law firm · the plan documents and the letter control

When it applies

  • Emergency care, including air ambulance
  • Anaesthesiology, radiology, pathology, assistant surgeons and other clinicians you could not choose at an in-network hospital or surgery centre
  • Post-stabilisation care until you can safely be moved

Where it does not

  • Elective out-of-network care you chose with a signed notice-and-consent form
  • Ground ambulance (state rules vary)

The sentence to put in the appeal

This claim is for [emergency services / non-emergency services by an out-of-network provider at an in-network facility] and is subject to 45 CFR Part 149. The plan must apply in-network cost-sharing and the provider may not balance-bill me beyond it. I did not sign a valid notice-and-consent waiver [or: the service is one for which consent cannot be waived]. Please reprocess the claim accordingly.

Replace the bracketed parts with your facts. Cite the regulation exactly as written; quote the plan’s own wording next to it.

How to use it

  1. Step 1

    Check the facility's network status

    In-network facility plus out-of-network clinician is the classic protected case.

  2. Step 2

    Find the consent form, if any

    Consent must be given 72 hours ahead for scheduled care and cannot be required for emergency or ancillary services.

  3. Step 3

    Use the federal complaint line

    CMS's No Surprises help desk takes complaints against plans and providers alongside the appeal.

Worked example

An out-of-network anaesthesiologist at an in-network surgery centre billed $4,800. The appeal cited Part 149; the plan reprocessed at in-network cost-sharing and the provider withdrew the balance bill.

Illustrative composite; details vary by plan and record. Outcomes are not guaranteed.

Go deeper

Ask an AI assistant about this page:ChatGPTPerplexityGoogle AIClaudeOpens in a new tab with a question about this page. Nothing about you is sent.

Sources

Want it written for you?

Upload the denial letter. A senior reviewer reads it within 24 hours, tells you in writing which rules apply and whether it can be appealed, and Apellica prepares the appeal with the citations. $0 upfront, 10% of what is recovered, nothing if we do not recover. Not a law firm.

Start a free denial review →

More levers