Skip to main content
Appeal outcomes · Panniculectomy · Digestive System/ GI

Panniculectomy for Digestive System/ GI: 83.3% of denials overturned

In 6 California IMR decisions from 2011 to 2020, reviewers overturned 5 (83.3%). 6 were medical-necessity disputes.

What the findings mention

From recent overturned decisions

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested authorization and coverage for panniculectomy for treatment of the enrollee who has a history of massive weight loss. Findings: The physician reviewer found that The submitted documentation supports the medical necessity for the requested procedure in this clinical setting. The patient is noted to have a significant lower abdominal pannus secondary …

Reviewer findings, overturned decision · Medical Necessity · 2017 · Source: California DMHC IMR determinations (CHHS Open Data), reference MN17-27331

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested a panniculectomy and abdominoplasty for treatment of her medical condition. Findings: The physician reviewer found that this patient presents with evidence of a symptomatic, lower abdominal pannus. She has a complicating factor of an umbilical hernia. Her symptoms have included chronic rashes treated with typical dermatologic medications, including cortisone and antifungal …

Reviewer findings, overturned decision · Medical Necessity · 2016 · Source: California DMHC IMR determinations (CHHS Open Data), reference MN16-22785

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: An enrollee has requested excision skin infraumbilical panniculectomy for treatment of her medical condition. Findings: The physician reviewer found that there is sufficient support for the requested services in this clinical setting. There is evidence of a symptomatic lower abdominal pannus in association with abdominal hernias. Her symptoms include abdominal pain treated conservatively with narcotic …

Reviewer findings, overturned decision · Medical Necessity · 2016 · Source: California DMHC IMR determinations (CHHS Open Data), reference MN16-22113

And one the reviewer upheld

Nature of Statutory Criteria/Case Summary: The patient has requested authorization and coverage for panniculectomy. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), a panniculectomy involves the removal of hanging excess skin and fat in a transverse or vertical wedge but does not include muscle plication, neoumbilicoplasty, or flap elevation. When surgery to remove extensive skin redundancy and fat folds …

Reviewer findings, overturned decision · Medical Necessity · 2020 · Source: California DMHC IMR determinations (CHHS Open Data), reference MN20-34192
Read these numbers carefully
  • California only: these are decisions by independent reviewers under California's IMR program (plans regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care). Other states and self-funded employer plans use different reviewers and rules.
  • Selection: only denials that a member took all the way to IMR appear. Most denials are never appealed, and the ones that reach an external reviewer are not a random sample.
  • Overturned means the reviewer disagreed with the plan; it does not mean the treatment worked or that a similar request will be approved.
  • Argument tags are keyword matches on the reviewer's findings. They describe what the findings mention, not why the case was decided.
  • Categories are DMHC's own labels (treatment sub-category and diagnosis category); 'Other' is a catch-all and is excluded from rankings.

Source: California Department of Managed Health Care, Independent Medical Review (IMR) Determinations, Trend (CHHS Open Data). Public California government data; Apellica's aggregates and tags are CC BY 4.0.

Questions

How often were Panniculectomy denials for Digestive System/ GI overturned?

In 6 California IMR decisions from 2011 to 2020, reviewers overturned 5 (83.3%). 6 were medical-necessity disputes.

What should an appeal document, based on these findings?

Whatever the plan's criteria ask for, shown in the record: the treatments already tried and their results, contraindications to the plan's preferred option, the guideline or evidence that supports the request, and the treating clinician's reasoning written to the criteria. The tag table shows which of these the reviewers mentioned most in overturned cases.

Does a California IMR result apply to my plan?

Only California plans regulated by the Department of Managed Health Care go to IMR. Other states and self-funded employer plans use different reviewers, but they weigh the same things.

Ask an AI assistant about this page:ChatGPTPerplexityGoogle AIClaudeOpens in a new tab with a question about this page. Nothing about you is sent.
Denied for this?

Independent reviewers reverse plans when the record answers the criteria. Upload the denial letter; a senior reviewer reads it within 24 hours and tells you in writing whether it can be appealed and how. $0 upfront, 10% of what is recovered, nothing if we do not recover. Not a law firm.